The Eye of the Beholder


I am sitting opposite a gentleman on the train of the most astonishing ugliness. The poor chap really is quite an eyeful, although when I analyse each feature in turn, there is little that should make his face any less attractive than many around it. His eyes are perhaps too close together, but they have long thick lashes. His nose, taken in isolation, is normal. His lips are rather full, voluptuous even. His chin is pointed but without jowls. Somehow, though, when everything is put together, it’s a face only a mother could love.

Other faces around me could be classed as beautiful or at least pretty, although they have almost no really distinguishing features, and it is perhaps that in itself which allows them to be easy on the eye.

I am drawn to wonder whether the same might be true of writing. Could a style too full of features, too rammed with metaphor and embellishment and structure be uglier than a spare style? My instinct screams ‘Yes!’, but it’s not always as simple as that.

Take, for example, Hemingway. Short, clipped sentences, very masculine. No messing about. As a writer, I find his style hard to swallow at first, it’s so dislocated and brusque, but after a while you do find your way into the rhythm of it. Is it beautiful? Many would think so. It certainly has a degree of crisp minimalism about it, which nonetheless allows him to convey some of the rawest and most intense of emotions.

Jane Austen, on the other hand, or Oscar Wilde, who I am reading at the moment, are more at the flowery end of things. Frankly, at Oscar’s trial for the crime of homosexuality, they just needed to read the first couple of pages of ‘The Picture of Dorian Gray’ aloud. It’s pretty camp stuff. Delightfully so. Austen, of course, conceals a sharp and observant wit amidst the fold of her prose.

John Wyndham, on the third and confusing middle hand, is quite another kettle of apples. His style is neither clipped, nor flowery. In fact, it is deceptively simple, and for that I admire him enormously. He manages to convey some pretty complex stories without burying them in language. He is, perhaps, the equivalent of those pretty people I see around me – nothing really distinctive, but that allows the story to shine through without the distraction  of style to overcome. Perhaps it sounds like his writing is bland, but instead I find that it is cleverly invisible: it allows the story to unfold in your head without the need for translation.

The chap sitting opposite me looks up, and I can see that fortune has been even crueller, and given him slightly crossed eyes as well. If I was going to be terribly patronising, I’d say that no doubt he has a beautiful soul. He may well do. But his exterior – the equivalent of his style – may reduce the chance of the beauty of that soul being revealed. In the same way, a writer who wraps up their subject matter in too much language may conceal the beauty of their story.

By contrast, I can think of a few authors who manage to write stuff of little substance, but who do it so gorgeously that you don’t really mind. There is certainly a whole squadron of people who you could point to who have a style which negates the need for any depth of personality or perspective. Being lovely is sometimes enough.

What do you think? Can you have style as a writer without substance? Or too much style? Love to hear your thoughts.


9 thoughts on “The Eye of the Beholder

  1. Wow….that was awesome. Great article. I pretty much think that there is a spectrum of styles just like there is a spectrum of beauty and that we are each gifted in a particular area. As long as we don’t start trying to change who we are and work with what we are given, we can make even the most flowery writing amazing and the most plain writing beautiful. 🙂

    • Thank you, and sorry its’ taken me so long to reply! I think you’re quite right that we need to try and work with what we are given. I’m sure we can refine our styles, but really you need to stick to your real voice at the core of it, or things will end up sounding phoney. I remember trying to teach some of the people in my office to hand-draft, and one girl meticulously copied the way that I draw plants. It looked laboured. When she did her own interpretation, it looked so much freeer and more confident.

      • No worries! I totally agree. It is one of the things I have to watch out for in my Creative Writing Class. I’m not looking to make a mirror image of what I love, but looking to help my students find their own voice and style.
        🙂 Thanks for the great article again!

  2. I agree. I think that there is a variation of beauty in the world, just as there is witgh writing. As writers we all bring something to the table. We all bring our own brand of beauty,

    • We do! But not everyones ‘beauty’ looks gorgeous to everyone else. Thankfully there is enough diversity in readers as well as writers that hopefully we find an appreciative eye.

  3. I always wondered if someone could see beyond the exterior into the heart, and if a noble heart has value. Probably not much in today’s world.

    Hemmingway’s style was derived from his years as a newspaper man. Another who followed that style was Tony Hillerman in his Jim Chee/Navaho detective series.

    It might be that our generation is distracted, and the flowing avuncular style of a VIctor Hugo just doesn’t fit our attention span.

    Hope you guys are well 🙂

    • I didn’t know that about Hemingway – makes a lot more sense now! Sounds like you are a tad cynical about people’s attention span now 😉
      I actually agree with you, but there does also seem to be a trend of people finding pockets and eddies in the huge flow of stuff out there, and getting deeply involved in small areas and communities.Perhaps we need that intense concentration on one thing for a while to prevent ourselves going mad with distraction. 🙂

  4. Amazing post. I think all writers are different because all people are. Fortunately, the writing world is a vast world, full of many styles and we are lucky to have the room to flourish in whatever direction that suits us as individuals.

Please let me know your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s